{"id":6831,"date":"2024-05-07T15:45:56","date_gmt":"2024-05-07T15:45:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/advisorator.com\/members\/?p=6831"},"modified":"2024-05-07T15:46:31","modified_gmt":"2024-05-07T15:46:31","slug":"5-7-2024-whats-an-expensive-phone-for","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/advisorator.com\/members\/2024\/05\/07\/5-7-2024-whats-an-expensive-phone-for\/","title":{"rendered":"5\/7\/2024: I’ve become a tech hippie"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

My path to tech hippieism<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Plus: AT&T’s data downgrade, Google’s passkey push, and a quick way to copy web links<\/h3>\n\n\n
May 7, 2024<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\"\"
Bitwarden, Obsidian, and Proton<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Over at Fast Company this week, I’ve got a lengthy profile of Bitwarden<\/a>, the password manager I use every day and have written about a bunch<\/a> of times<\/a> here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The story is mostly about Bitwarden’s origins, how it makes money, and what its role might become in a world where Apple’s and Google’s built-in password managers keep getting better. One angle I didn’t really touch on, though, is what software like Bitwarden means to me personally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yes, I use Bitwarden because its generous free tier was effective at getting me in the door, and because I’ve grown to enjoy some features such as masked email integration<\/a>. But it also aligns with my values as a sustainable, durable tech product that’s unlikely to put the screws to its users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over the past year or so, I’ve been seeking out these products more often while becoming less reliant on fly-by-night startups or major tech companies, whose own offerings seem to be getting worse over time<\/a>. Bitwarden is just one example of software that’s actually built to last.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n

Read the full column<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Advisorator’s paid subscribers get my full feature column at the top of each newsletter (including this week’s story<\/a> on becoming a tech hippie). Read it now with a free trial<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\tSubscribe<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div><\/section><\/section>\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Need to know<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

AT&T’s data downgrade:<\/strong> AT&T is now selling a $7-per-month “Turbo” upgrade for unlimited mobile data plans, claiming it’ll offer a higher-priority connection for things like video calling and live streaming. But it’s also quietly downgrading customers who don’t pay the toll<\/a>, moving them to a lower-priority tier of its network. (I just wrote about these prioritization tiers, called “Quality of Service Class Identifiers,” in last week’s newsletter<\/a>.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wireless carriers already deprioritize customers in times of network congestion when they’ve used more monthly data than their plan allows. Now it wants people to pay extra to avoid being stuck in a slow lane regardless, which makes you wonder what’s the point of those data allotments to begin with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Google’s passkey push:<\/strong> Google says more than 400 million accounts have used passkeys<\/a>, which it’s pushing as a replacement for passwords in tandem with Apple and Microsoft. With passkeys, your device’s face or fingerprint detection essentially proves who you are, rendering user-created passwords unnecessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have written about passkeys numerous times<\/a>, both here<\/a> and at Fast Company<\/a>, and while the idea makes sense, the implementation is a mess. Every app and website handles passkey creation differently, and the ability to access your passkeys depends on which device, browser, and password manager you’re using. You still can’t export passkeys, either, so you’re locked into whichever platform or password manager is creating them for you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How do you square all that with Google’s 400 million-user figure? Google automatically creates passkeys for Android users<\/a>, who presumably account for a huge chunk of the adoption. While the company says it’s recorded more than 1 billion passkey authentications thus far, that averages out to a measly two or three logins per account. You can safely keep ignoring this tech until the kinks get ironed out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pandora price hike:<\/strong> Pandora was the last holdout on charging $10 per month for unlimited on-demand streaming music, but it’s quietly raised the price to $11 per month like its rivals<\/a>. Prices are also up to $18 per month for families, $6 per month for students, and $9 per month for military.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Seemingly no one has reported on this, which shows you how much people care about Pandora these days. (I still think its free internet radio offering is unparalleled<\/a>.) I’ve updated my streaming music savings guide<\/a> accordingly. (Thanks for the tip, Matthew<\/a>!)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Tip of the moment<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Quickly copy links:<\/strong> Last week, I came across a neat Safari extension called Supercopy<\/a>, which does precisely one thing: It adds a Cmd+Shift+C keyboard shortcut that copies the address of your current page, be it on a Mac or an iOS device with an external keyboard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you browse the web as much as I do, you probably wind up copying a lot of links to paste elsewhere, so naturally I got to thinking about the fastest ways to copy a link in other browsers. A rundown:<\/p>\n\n\n\n